理论研究 2025年 第卷 第12期

DOI: 10. 7672 / sgjs2025120034

基于 AHP⁃PPC 模型的全生命周期绿色建筑增量成本与建筑碳排放影响因素分析

陈雨婷¹,孙永宁¹,冯莞婷¹,张 良²,高 亮¹

作者简介:

陈雨婷,本科在读,E⁃mail:2356939247@ qq. com

作者单位:

1. 山东建筑大学,山东 济南 250000;2. 山东轨道交通勘察设计院有限公司,山东 济南 250000

基金项目:

∗国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(202410430001)

摘要:

在“双碳”战略目标驱动下,绿色建筑作为建筑业低碳转型的核心载体,其增量成本与碳减排效益的协同机制亟待厘清. 基于全生命周期理论框架,构建 AHP⁃PPC 混合模型,通过主观赋权与客观投影寻踪聚类的动态耦合,系统识别绿色建筑增量成本与碳排放的关键影响因素. 结果表明:施工阶段的环保材料采购成本与节能技术集成成本构成增量成本主要驱动源,运营阶段的可再生能源系统能效与围护结构热工性能对碳减排具有显著杠杆效应. 研究创新性地融合静态权重分析与动态数据投影,有效克服传统 AHP 方法的主观局限性,据此提出的四维优化路径,即材料优选、技术适配、能源替代、性能迭代,为绿色建筑的“成本⁃碳效”双向优化提供了决策框架. 成果不仅完善了绿色建筑全生命周期评价方法体系,更为行业践行“双碳”目标提供了兼具理论深度与实践价值的解决方案.

English:

Under China’ s carbon neutrality and carbon peaking strategic goals, this study clarifies thesynergy between incremental costs and carbon reduction benefits in green buildings. A hybrid AHP⁃PPCmodel was developed within a whole⁃life⁃cycle framework, integrating subjective weighting with objectiveprojection pursuit to identify key influencing factors. The results show: Construction⁃phase driversinclude eco⁃material procurement and energy⁃efficient technology integration costs; Operational leverageeffects stem from renewable energy efficiency and building envelope thermal performance. Innovativelycombining static⁃dynamic analysis, this research overcomes traditional AHP limitations and proposes afour⁃dimensional optimization framework (material selection, technology adaptation, energy substitution,performance iteration ) for cost⁃carbon dual optimization. The results advance life⁃cycle assessmentmethodologies and provide actionable solutions for achieving carbon neutrality and carbon peaking inconstruction.