应用研究 2025年 第卷 第17期

DOI: 10.7672 / sgjs2025170119

宽桥面箱梁桥梁格模型与偏载效应分析

杨斌¹,郝优¹,赵超²

作者简介:

杨斌,工程师,E-mail: roker25@ qq. com

作者单位:

1.中交第三公路工程局有限公司,北京 100102; 2.湖南科技大学土木工程学院,湖南湘潭 411201

基金项目:

∗国家自然科学基金( 51678235 );湖南省自然科学基金(2020JJ5195);湖南省教育厅基金(20B218)

摘要:

当前简化计算方法计算宽桥面箱梁桥偏载系数时存在精度不足、不利于推广的问题,以某景观桥为研究对象,采用有限元软件 MIDAS Civil 建立宽桥面多箱室箱梁桥梁格模型,研究偏载系数的分布规律及其影响因素。为验证数值方法的合理性、有效性,以 3 座已建预应力混凝土连续箱梁桥的数值模拟结果为基准,对比分析偏载效应分析方法、修正偏压法以及经验系数法的适用性。结果表明,在宽桥面多室箱梁桥中,经验系数法和修正偏压法不适用于计算剪应力偏载系数,计算结果严重偏低,且难以考虑不同截面的差异性,甚至在设计阶段出现腹板主拉应力超限的情况。梁格模型及偏载效应分析方法可较准确计算宽桥面多室箱梁桥的偏载系数,并能给出偏载系数沿桥跨变化的规律。

English:

There are shortcomings and difficulties in promoting the current simplified calculation methodsfor calculating the eccentric load coefficient of wide bridge deck box girder bridges, a landscape bridgewas taken as the research object, the finite element software MIDAS Civil was used to establish a gridmodel, and the distribution law and influencing factors of the eccentric load coefficient were studied. Toverify the rationality and effectiveness of the numerical method, the applicability for the eccentric loadeffect analysis method, modified bias method, and empirical coefficient were compared, based on thenumerical simulation results of 3 existing prestressed concrete continuous box girder bridges. The resultsshow that, for multi-chamber box girder bridges with wide bridge decks, the empirical coefficient methodand the modified bias method are not suitable for calculating the shear stress eccentric load coefficient,the calculation results are seriously low, and it is difficult to consider the differences in different sections,even during the design stage, there was a situation where the main tensile stress of the web exceeded thelimit. The beam grid model and the eccentric load effect analysis method can accurately calculate theeccentric load coefficient, and provide the law of the variation.