岩土与地下工程 2026年 第卷 第01期

DOI: 10. 7672 / sgjs2026010067

贵州打哨隧道超前加固施工三维数值分析

李文辉

作者简介:

李文辉,助理工程师,E⁃mail:yuesls@ foxmail. com

作者单位:

中铁十八局集团第三工程有限公司,河北 涿州 072750

基金项目:

中铁十八局集团有限公司 2024 年度科研创新项目(2024⁃031)

摘要:

隧道掌子面稳定性直接关系到施工安全与地表沉降控制效果. 为探究不同超前加固技术的适用性与加固效果,以贵州打哨隧道浅埋段为工程背景,综合现场监测与三维数值模拟对管棚法与新意法进行了对比研究. 基于 Plaxis 3D 建立仿真模型,分别模拟了两种加固方式下的地表沉降、隧道拱顶位移及开挖面挤出量响应特征. 结果表明:新意法对开挖面稳定性的提升更为显著,尤其在加固密度较高(55 根玻璃纤维锚杆)条件下,挤出量较管棚法降低约 57%,地表沉降控制效果提高约 20%. 两种加固方法对围岩水平位移影响趋势一致,但新意法在抑制隧道中心处位移方面优势更明显.

English:

The stability of the tunnel face is directly related to the construction safety and the controleffect of surface subsidence. To explore the applicability and reinforcement effect of different advancedreinforcement technologies, taking the shallow buried section of the Guizhou Dashao Tunnel as theengineering background, the pipe arch method and the new Italian tunneling method are compared andstudied by comprehensive field monitoring and three⁃dimensional numerical simulation. Based on Plaxis3D, a simulation model was established to simulate the response characteristics of surface settlement,tunnel vault displacement, and excavation surface extrusion under the two reinforcement methods. Theresults indicate that the new Italian tunneling method has a more significant improvement in the stabilityof the excavation face, especially under the condition of high reinforcement density ( 55 glass fiberanchors). The extrusion amount is reduced by about 57% compared with that of the pipe arch method,and the surface settlement control effect is increased by about 20%. The two reinforcement methods havethe same influence trend on the horizontal displacement of surrounding rock, but the new Italian tunnelingmethod has more obvious advantages in suppressing the displacement at the center of the tunnel.