桥梁工程 2026年 第卷 第02期

DOI: 10.7672 / sgjs2026020039

高墩大跨不对称连续刚构桥承载力试验研究

谭达¹,黄晓敏¹,茹兴伦²,毛德均³

作者简介:

谭达,硕士研究生,E-mail:tanda@ stu. kust. edu. cn

作者单位:

1.昆明理工大学建筑工程学院,云南昆明 650500; 2.云南正发工程设计有限公司,云南昆明 650500; 3.昆明学院建筑工程学院,云南昆明 650214

基金项目:

∗2023 年云南省“三区”科技人才项目( ZX20230237); 2023 年云南省科技特派员项目( ZX20230180 );昆明学院引进人才科研项目(XJ20220031)

摘要:

以某高墩大跨不对称连续刚构桥为工程背景,通过静动载试验,对比分析试验实测结果与有限元计算结果,评估其承载力。结果表明:静载试验条件下,梁体结构应力校验系数在 0.44 —— 0.89,表明桥跨结构整体强度较好;挠度校验系数在 0.42—— 0.87,表明桥跨结构整体刚度较好。各工况卸载后,相对残余应力及变形均未超出规范规定的 20%,表明梁体基本处于弹性工作状态。动载试验条件下,A—A,B—B,C—C 截面实测无障碍行车试验冲击系数分别在 0.041—— 0.049,0.031—— 0.050,0.042—— 0.044,A—A,C—C 截面冲击系数小于设计值,说明结构在设计荷载的正常行驶状态下不会产生过大冲击,B—B 截面冲击系数趋于设计值,在今后桥梁运营中,应加强桥梁 B—B截面的观察及养护。该桥结构自振频率实测值大于理论计算值,桥梁实测阻尼比在正常范围内。该桥的承载力满足设计(公路-Ⅰ级)承载力要求。

English:

Taking a high-pier and large-span asymmetric continuous rigid frame bridge as engineeringbackground, the bearing capacity of the bridge is evaluated by comparing the measured results with thefinite element calculation results through static and dynamic load tests. The results show that under staticload test conditions, the stress calibration coefficient of the girder body is between 0.44 and 0.89,whichindicates that the overall strength of the bridge span structure is good; The deflection calibrationcoefficient is between 0.42 and 0.87,which indicates that the overall stiffness of the bridge spanstructure is good. After unloading, the relative residual stress and deformation do not exceed 20% of thespecifications, indicating that the girder body is basically in elastic working state. Under the conditions ofdynamic load test, the impact factor of A—A section measured in barrier-free driving test ranges from0.041 to 0.049, the real impact factor of B—B section ranges from 0.031 to 0.050, and the impactfactor of C—C section ranges from 0.042 to 0.044. The impact factors of A—A and C—C sections areless than the design value. It shows that the structure will not produce too much impact under the normaldriving state of the design load, and the impact factor of B—B section is close to the design value. In thefuture bridge operation, the observation and maintenance of B—B section of the bridge should bestrengthened. The measured natural frequency of the bridge structure is greater than the theoretical calculated value, and the measured damping ratio of the bridge is in the normal range. The bearingcapacity of the bridge meets the design (highway-Ⅰclass) bearing requirements.