应用研究 2026年 第卷 第03期

DOI: 10.7672 / sgjs2026030150

大跨度钢拱桥长期服役疲劳性能评估

姚文广

作者简介:

姚文广,高级工程师,E-mail:yaowenguang258@ yeah. net

作者单位:

中交路建交通科技有限公司,北京 101399

基金项目:

∗中交路建交通科技有限公司科研项目

摘要:

针对中、下承式钢拱桥关键构件柔性吊杆疲劳安全问题,以某主跨 916m 的中承式钢桁拱桥为工程背景,研究耳板式锚固结构疲劳性能。建立全桥三维有限元模型,结合车辆荷载动力分析,揭示拱脚区域 1 号短吊杆应力达跨中吊杆 2.5~ 3 倍的核心规律。通过对比等效疲劳车辆模型及不同国家规范疲劳验算结果,量化锚固结构关键部位应力响应,得到耳板式锚固结构板件最大正应力为 51.0MPa,焊缝最大剪应力为 21.3MPa,均满足各国规范限值要求。实际工程中应控制销轴与耳板孔径公差≤0.1mm,并实施硬度梯度控制;锚板与耳板焊接过渡区设置半径≥50mm 的圆弧,并打磨焊趾;以双曲面球铰替代球冠垫块,分丝板孔缘倒半径≥2mm 的圆角。

English:

Aiming at the fatigue safety problem of the flexible hangers of the key components of themiddle-bearing and below-bearing steel arch bridges, this paper takes a middle-bearing steel truss archbridge with a main span of 916m as the engineering background to study the fatigue performance of theear plate anchorage structure. The three-dimensional finite element model of the whole bridge isestablished. Combined with the dynamic analysis of vehicle load, the core rule that the stress of No. 1short hanger in the arch foot area is 2.5 to 3 times that of the mid-span hanger is revealed. By comparingthe equivalent fatigue vehicle and different national standard load models, the stress response of the keyparts of the anchorage structure is quantified. The maximum normal stress of the ear plate anchoragestructure plate is 51.0MPa, and the maximum shear stress of the weld is 21.3MPa,which meets therequirements of the multi-national standard limit. In practical engineering, the hole diameter tolerancebetween pin shaft and ear plate should be controlled equal or lesser than 0.1mm, and the hardnessgradient control should be implemented. The arc with radius greater than or equal to 50mm is set in thewelding transition zone between the anchor plate and the ear plate, and the welding toe is polished. Thehyperboloid spherical hinge is used to replace the ball crown block, and the fillet of the hole edge of thesplitter plate is greater than or equal to 2mm.