安装工程 2026年 第卷 第08期

DOI: 10.7672 / sgjs2026080030

盘扣式桁架梁支撑体系设计与应用

张 新¹,王向鹏¹,王 睿²,郑永峰¹

作者简介:

张 新,副教授,硕士生导师,E⁃mail: 15969698504@ 163. com

作者单位:

1. 山东建筑大学土木工程学院,山东 济南 250101; 2. 济南市工程质量与安全中心,山东 济南 250102

基金项目:

∗山东省重点研发计划(重大科技创新工程)(2021CXGC011204)

摘要:

盘扣式支撑架已广泛应用于混凝土结构支撑体系,房屋建筑中由于设置梁下立杆多导致立杆横向间距不符合模数. 双槽钢支撑体系可实现梁下无立杆,但存在自重大、安拆困难问题. 盘扣式桁架梁支撑体系以轻型桁架梁为梁底模板主龙骨,两端通过扣接头与梁侧立杆上部可调长顶托连接盘扣接,实现了梁下无立杆、自重小、安拆便捷. 根据桁架梁跨度、弦杆间距及受压区宽度 3 种影响因素,设计 19 组桁架梁方案,通过数值分析研究不同因素对桁架梁力学性能的影响. 研究结果表明,桁架梁承载力由材料强度控制,而非变形控制;桁架梁跨度是影响桁架梁承载力的关键因素. 桁架梁跨度从 1 200mm 增大至 1 800mm,承载力降低约 44.8%;相同跨度桁架梁增加上、下弦杆间距可增强桁架梁抗弯性能. 弦杆间距从 80mm 增大至 110mm,1 800mm 跨度桁架梁承载力平均提高约14. 1%;受压区宽度变化主要影响均布荷载大小,对桁架梁承载力影响较小.

English:

The disk lock support has been widely applied in concrete structure support systems. Inbuilding construction, the arrangement of vertical poles beneath beams often results in the transversespacing of vertical poles failing to meet modulus requirements. The double⁃channel steel support systemenables the elimination of vertical poles under beams, but it suffers from the issues such as heavy self⁃weight and difficulty in installation and dismantling. The disk lock truss beam support system useslightweight truss beams as the main keel for beam bottom formwork, with both ends connected to theadjustable jacking on the vertical poles at the beam sides via coupler connectors, achieving no verticalpoles under beams, light self⁃weight, and convenient installation and dismantling. Based on threeinfluencing factors such as truss beam span, chord member spacing, and compression zone width, thispaper designed 19 truss beam configurations and conducted numerical simulation to investigate the effectsof different factors on the mechanical properties of truss beams. The research results show that the load⁃bearing capacity of truss beams is governed by material strength rather than deformation. The span of thetruss beam is a key factor affecting its load⁃bearing capacity. When the truss beam span increased from1 200mm to 1 800mm, the load⁃bearing capacity decreased by approximately 44.8%. For truss beamswith the same span, increasing the spacing between the upper and lower chord members enhanced theflexural performance. When the chord member spacing increased from 80mm to 110mm, the load⁃bearingcapacity of the truss beams with a span of 1 800mm increased by an average of approximately 14.1%.Variations in the compression zone width mainly affected the magnitude of the uniformly distributed load and had a relatively minor influence on the load⁃bearing capacity of the truss beams.