罗山寺塔动力特性及地震响应分析

作者：员作义¹’², 卢俊龙², 李贞³, 陈一凡⁴

作者简介：

员作义，高级工程师，E-mail:760078726@qq.com

作者单位：

1.陕西省建筑科学研究院有限公司，陕西西安 710082；2.西安理工大学土木建筑工程学院陕西西安 710048；3.中国建筑西北设计研究院有限公司，陕西西安 710018；4.陕西普宁工程结构特种技术有限公司，陕西西安 710055

基金项目：

*陕西省建筑科学研究院科研课题（2015-01-247）

摘要：

为研究罗山寺塔的动力特性及地震响应，通过原位动力测试获得了罗山寺塔的各方向自振频率，并采用有限元分析软件对结构进行地震响应分析。研究结果表明：通过经验公式和有限元分析得到的结构特性与原位动力测试结果基本一致；各烈度地震作用下的塔身底部楼层位移角较大，塔身顶部的鞭梢效应较明显；结构的楼层水平位移随加载时程增加而增大，基底剪力与地震波加速度响应一致；塔身底部及各层拱券洞口位置的砖砌体损伤较严重。

关键词：砖塔；动力特性；数值模拟；地震损伤；地震响应

English：

In order to study the dynamic characteristics and seismic response of Luoshan Temple Pagoda under earthquake action, the seismic frequency of Luoshan Temple Pagoda in all directions was obtained by in-situ dynamic testing, and the seismic response of the pagoda structure was analyzed by finite element analysis model. The results show that the structural properties obtained by empirical formula and finite element analysis are basically consistent with the test results of in-situ dynamics;The displacement angle of the bottom floor of the pagoda structure under the earthquake intensity is larger, and the whipping effect at the top of the pagoda is obvious; The horizontal displacement of the structure increases with the increase of loading time, and the response of the base shear is consistent with the acceleration of seismic waves; The damage of the masonry masonry at the bottom of the pagoda body and the openings of each layer of arch coupons is relatively serious.

[1]	卢俊龙, 李传立, 韩鑫, 等. 实心结构砖塔地震损伤数值模拟与试验验证[J]. 振动工程学报, 2020, 33(2): 364-371.LU Junlong, LI Chuanli, HAN Xin, et al. Numerical simulation and test verification of seismic damage for a brick masonry pagoda[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2020, 33(2): 364-371.
[2]	钱春宇, 徐敦峰, 浩文明, 等. 西安小雁塔结构模型振动台试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(22): 67-75.QIAN Chunyu, XU Dunfeng, HAO Wenming, et al. Shaking table test on a model of Xi'an Xiaoyan pagoda[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(22): 67-75.
[3]	韩鑫, 卢俊龙, 韦俊, 等.西安八云塔动力性能与地震损伤机制[J]. 应用力学学报, 2020, 37(3): 1305-1313, 1408.HAN Xin, LU Junlong, Wei Jun, et al. Dynamic performance and seismic damage mechanism of Xi'an Bayun pagoda[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2020, 37(3): 1305-1313, 1408.
[4]	VALENTE M, MILANI G. Seismic assessment of historical masonry pagodas by means of simplified approachcs and standard FEM[J]. Construction and building materials, 2016, 108:74-104.
[5]	杨涛, 赵浩, 李燕伟, 等. 历史建筑砌体结构无损加固技术及抗震性能试验研究[J]. 施工技术, 2020, 49(10): 59-62.YANG Tao, ZHAO Hao, LI Yanwei, et al. Experimental study on undamaged reinforcement technology and seismic performance of masonry structure of historical buildings[J]. Construction technology, 2020, 49(10): 59-62.
[6]	徐进. 陕西古塔全编[M]. 西安：西北大学出版社，2018.XU JIN. Summary of ancient pagodas in Shaanxi[M]. Xi'an: Northwestern University Press, 2018.
[7]	丁瑞彬, 张文芳, 牛力军. 剪-压复合作用下砌体抗剪能力的数值模拟验证[J].施工技术, 2015, 44(S2): 588-592.DING Ruibing, ZHANG Wenfang, NIU Lijun. Numerical Simulation of Masonry Shear Bearing Capacity in Compression-shear[J]. Construction Technology, 2015, 44(S2): 588-592.
[8]	杨卫忠. 砌体受压本构关系模型[J]. 建筑结构, 2008(10): 80-82.YANG Weizhong. Constitutive relationship model for masonry materials in compression[J]. Building Structure, 2008(10): 80-82.
[9]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部,混凝土结构设计规范：GB 50010-2010（2015年版）[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.Code for design of concrete structures ： GB 50010-2010[S]．2015 ed. Beijing：China Architecture & Building Press， 2010.
[10]	吕伟荣, 施楚贤. 普通砖砌体受压本构模型[J]. 建筑结构, 2006(11): 77-78, 53.LU Weirong, SHI Chuxian. Constitutive reationship of brick masonry[J]. Building Structure, 2006(11): 77-78, 53.
[11]	袁建力. 砖石古塔基本周期的简化计算方法[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2015, 35(2): 151-156.YUAN Jianli, A simplified method for calculating the fundamental period of ancient masonry pagodas[J]. Earthouake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2015, 35(2): 151-156.

网络首发