装配式混凝土建筑综合效益评价体系研究
作者简介:
王 茹, 教 授, 博 士 生 导 师, E⁃mail: wangru@ xauat.edu. cn
作者单位:
1. 西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710055;2. 西安建筑科技大学结构工程与抗震教育部重点实验室,陕西 西安 710055
基金项目:
∗陕西省重点研发计划⁃重点产业链项目( 2024SF2⁃GJHX⁃65);西安市社发科技创新项目(23SFSF0013)
摘要:
国内装配式混凝土建筑评价标准体系尚处于不断完善的阶段,评价指标较单一,无法充分发挥其在结构和成本上的优势,还会带来易建性差的问题. 从易建性效益、安全效益、经济效益、环境效益和社会效益等方面分析,通过文献调查、调研问卷初筛评价指标,结合专家咨询构建了装配式混凝土建筑综合效益评价指标体系,运用AHP⁃CRITIC 组合赋权方法克服单一方法赋权的主客观缺陷,实现对评价指标更加科学合理的组合赋权. 同时基于模糊综合评价法建立了装配式混凝土建筑综合效益评价模型,并通过对所构建的评价模型进行验证,对比分析了装配式混凝土建筑与现浇建筑及不同设计方案的装配式混凝土建筑之间的综合效益评价结果.

English:
The evaluation standard system of prefabricated concrete buildings in China is still in the stageof continuous improvement. The evaluation index is relatively single, which cannot give full play to itsadvantages in structure and cost, and will also bring about the problem of poor buildability. From theaspects of easy⁃to⁃build benefits, safety benefits, economic benefits, environmental benefits and socialbenefits, the evaluation index system of comprehensive benefits of prefabricated concrete buildings isconstructed through literature survey, questionnaire preliminary screening evaluation index, combinedwith expert consultation. The AHP⁃CRITIC combination weighting method overcomes the subjective andobjective defects of single method weighting, and realizes more scientific and reasonable combinationweighting of evaluation indicators. At the same time, based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluationmethod, the comprehensive benefit evaluation model of prefabricated concrete buildings is established,and the comprehensive benefit evaluation results between prefabricated concrete buildings and cast⁃in⁃place buildings and prefabricated concrete buildings with different design schemes are compared andanalyzed by verifying the constructed evaluation model.